Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. City of San Bernardino

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1946No. L. A. 19148Published

1Opinion of the Court

29 Cal.2d 332 (1946)

A. L. WILKINS, Respondent,

v.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO et al., Appellants.

L. A. No. 19148.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 3, 1946.

H. R. Griffin and Martin J. Coughlin for Appellants.

E. John Eriksson and Homer M. Bail for Respondent.

GIBSON, C.J.

Plaintiff sought declaratory relief, claiming that the zoning ordinance of the city of San Bernardino was unreasonable and invalid as applied to the west 112 feet of his property because that portion was placed in a single family dwelling zone. The remainder of this property is located in a small or "spot" business zone which…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API