Legal Opinion

Kevorkian v. Thompson

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 6, 1997No. 2:96-cv-73777PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this declaratory judgmenVinjunctive relief action, Plaintiffs Jack Kevorkian and Janet Good seek a court order enjoining Defendant Richard Thompson and his successor in the office of Oakland County Prosecutor from prosecuting Kevorkian for his assisted suicide activities. At the heart of both Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and their motion for summary judgment is their contention that the statutes and the common law under which…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Joseph A. ex rel. Corrine Wolfe v. IngramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Evans v. KelleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Hart v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API