Kevorkian v. Thompson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this declaratory judgmenVinjunctive relief action, Plaintiffs Jack Kevorkian and Janet Good seek a court order enjoining Defendant Richard Thompson and his successor in the office of Oakland County Prosecutor from prosecuting Kevorkian for his assisted suicide activities. At the heart of both Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and their motion for summary judgment is their contention that the statutes and the common law under which…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Joseph A. ex rel. Corrine Wolfe v. IngramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Evans v. KelleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Hart v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.