Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Gun Choe v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 14, 1993No. 91-70443Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

ALARCON, Circuit Judge,

specially concurring in part and dissenting in part.

In this matter, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) issued an order to show cause against Reverend In Gun Choe charging that he was deportable on the basis that he was excludable at his time of entry into the United States because (1) he had obtained an adjustment of immigration status to permanent resident as a special immigrant minister by fraud or willful misrepresentation of a material fact; and (2) at the time of his entry into the United States as a visitor, he intended to remain permanently and to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chisom v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Sergeant Perry Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API