Legal Opinion
Hallberg v. Hendricks County Office of Family & Children
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1996No. 32A01-9507-JV-218PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-respondent (Glenn Hallberg appeals the trial court's determination that his two daughters, K.H. and S.H., are children in need of services (CHINS). Specifically, Glenn contends that: (1) the Hendricks Circuit Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to issue a protective order against him and to find that S.H. and K.H. were CHINS, (2) the Hendricks Circuit Court failed to serve him with a summons or a copy of the CHINS petition as required by IND.CODE § 81-6-7-4, (8) the Hendricks Circuit Court erred in denying his motions for a continuance, and (4) the evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- In the Matter of LemondIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Fetner v. Maury Boyd & Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Meade v. Marshall Superior Court IIIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re D.E.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- B.H. v. Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- T.Y.T. v. Allen County Division of Family & ChildrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re K.B.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- A.H. v. Bartholomew County Office of Family & ChildrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.