Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Meade v. Marshall Superior Court II

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1994No. 50S00-9405-OR-409PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Does a court which dissolved a marriage and determined child custody and visitation maintain continuing jurisdiction which prevents another court from entertaining petitions for protective orders which effectively modify the divorcee decree? We hold that such protective orders must be filed in the court which heard the divorce, absent emer-geney or other good cause for going to a second court.

Facts and Case History

In September 1991, Teri Lee Meade and Paul E. Levett were divorced in the Marshall Cireuit Court. The court ordered joint custody of their children, Whitney…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of LemondIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Ferger v. Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State ex rel. International Harvester Co. v. Allen Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. McClure v. Marion Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Marriage of Basileh v. AlghusainIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Thacker v. BartlettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. KapitanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Crawfordsville Apartment Co. v. Key Trust Co. of FloridaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Fackler v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API