Dooley v. Anton
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew J. Jasen, J.
This is a motion brought by the defendants to show cause why damages, losses and expenses *1031sustained by reason of a temporary injunction granted against them should not be ascertained and determined by this court pursuant to section 894 of the Civil Practice Act.
On May 29, 1958, plaintiff commenced an action for a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from picketing at the plaintiff’s place of business. On August 1, 1958, this court granted a temporary injunction enjoining the defendants from picketing and from doing various other activities pending the trial of the action, and a bond…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jackson v. . BunnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Matter of Water Commissioners of Amsterdam, ChalmersNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Fulton v. KrullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Monti Marine Corp. v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1960