Legal Opinion

United States v. James Randy Chriswell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 18, 2005No. 04-5020PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

Defendant James Randy Chriswell was convicted by a jury after a two-day trial of one count of attempt via the internet to persuade, induce, entice and coerce a minor to engage in sexual activity and one count of traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity with a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422(b) and 2423(b). The district court imposed a two level enhancement to Chriswell’s sentence pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G.) § 2A3.2(b)(2)(B)(2003) for unduly influencing the victim, an undercover FBI…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. John Allen RootCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. John MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Ronnie Bazel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. BrandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Charles Anthony Davidson (03-6544) Debra Ann Davidson (03-6549)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Thomas Reid DecarloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. LayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Donald GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API