Legal Opinion
Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P.C.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1985No. Civ. 10172PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
On July 1, 1982, this Court, in a unanimous opinion, affirmed the judgment of the District Court of Ward County. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Affiliated) had appealed from a judgment of that court dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The basic issue on appeal was~l whether or not the state court had subject I matter jurisdiction over a civil action aris- \ ing within the exterior boundaries of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in which Affiliated was the plaintiff and the defendants were non-Indians.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Davis v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.