Legal Opinion · Dissent

Calloway v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 2000No. 99-5215, 99-5216Published

1DissentGinsburg, Circuit Judge

I concur in Parts I and II of the opinion for the Court and in the judgment in No. 99-5215, rejecting the families’ constitutional challenges. I dissent from Part III of the opinion and from the judgment in No. 99-5216 because I believe that for FY 1999 the Congress modified the authority of the district court to award attorneys’ fees under § 615 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1415.

I. Backgi’ound

The Congress reenacted § 615 of the IDEA with considerable revisions in 1997. See Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments for 1997, Pub.L. No.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Clinton v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API