Legal Opinion

Davis v. Bayne

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1932No. 23895. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondents sued appellants to recover ten thousand dollars damages, alleging that apl pellants had fraudulently represented to respondents the laundry known as the Washington Laundry in Vancouver as having earned a profit before depreciation for the first ten months of 1928, of $4,240.74; that the laundry had theretofore been a prosperous business for some years, earning a large income, and that appellants desired to sell because of dissension among themselves; that appellants- Bayne, Ringer and wife falsely and fraudulently represented to respondents that the current unpaid bills would not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Christensen v. KochWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Wilson v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Champneys v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Forsyth v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Biel v. TolsmaWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vail v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API