Legal Opinion

Vail v. Bailey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1934No. 25005. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This action was brought by appellants herein to recover damages for alleged fraud in the sale and purchase, under executory contract, of a telephone system, and further, to enjoin respondents from enforcing a threatened forfeiture of the contract. Bespondents denied the allegations of fraud, and by cross-complaint sought to have the contract forfeited for failure to make the agreed payments. Trial before the court resulted in a decree adjudging that ap pellants take nothing by their action, and that the contract he forfeited and cancelled. From that decree, this appeal was taken.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hahn v. BrickellWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Bank of Chewelah v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Surry v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Child v. Idaho Hewer Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Davis v. Associated Fruit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brabazon v. GordonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API