State v. Casalicchio
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The state asserts that Casalicchio’s automobile falls within Ohio’s contraband forfeiture statutes *179and the trial court’s action was proper in all respects. Casalicchio raises several constitutional challenges to the forfeiture statutes on cross-appeal, challenging them on their face and as applied in this case. The state’s and Casalicchio’s assertions require a significant review of R.C. 2933.42 and R. C. 2933.43, Ohio’s contraband forfeiture statutes.
I
Initially, Casalicchio challenges on due process grounds the scope of the forfeiture statutes. Specifically, he questions whether his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. $174,206.00 in U.S. Currency, Thomas Richard, Dacia LoveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Department of Liquor Control v. Sons of Italy Lodge 0917Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Dardinger v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue SheildOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. DepueOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.