Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company v. William R. Ponsoldt
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Chief Judge:
The version of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that governed service of process at the time the complaint was filed in this case 1 provided for three methods of serving an individual defendant. The primary method, personal service, required that the process server “deliver[] a copy of the summons and complaint to the individual personally,” or that the process server leave a copy of the summons and complaint with a competent person at the defendant’s home, or with an authorized agent. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(1). In addition, Rule 4 provided for two alternative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Stauffer Building Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Umbenhauer v. WoogCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Robert Norlock v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Humana, Inc., D/B/A Humana Hospital San Antonio, Plaintiff-Counter v. Avram A. Jacobson, M.D., P.A., Defendant-CounterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Stranahan Gear Company, Inc. v. Nl Industries, Inc. v. Blue Streak Industries, Inc. Appeal of Nl Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tina M. Lepone-Dempsey v. Carroll County Comm'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Robinson Engineering Company, Ltd. Pension Plan and Trust and R. W. Robinson & Associates Company Profit Sharing Plan v. Mark G. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Simon v. Morehouse School of MedicineDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
- Adekunle B. Ojelade v. William Buster ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- DIXIT v. FAIRNOTDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.