Legal Opinion

Durso v. Rowe

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 7, 1977No. 76 C 3765PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBSON, Senior District Judge.

This cause is before the court on the motion 1 of defendants 2 Charles Rowe, Allyn R. Sielaff, David V. Brierton, Edward Jordan, and Joseph Barda to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motion shall be granted.

Plaintiff, Thomas Durso, is presently incarcerated at the Illinois State Penitentiary, Stateville Branch, Joliet, Illinois. Represented by counsel, he brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas Durso v. Charles RoweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  2. Lonnie Arsberry v. Allyn R. Sielaff, Harold Longstreet v. Allyn R. SielaffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. Winsett v. McGinnesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
  4. Bryant v. CarlsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API