Legal Opinion
Rukavina v. Sprague
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided October 12, 2007No. 20060600-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
McHUGH, Judge:
1 1 Andy Rukavina appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for relief from judgment seeking a new trial. The motion was filed in response to the jury's special verdict finding that Thomas Sprague's negligence was not a proximate cause of Rukavina's injuries. Ru-kavina argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for relief from judgment made pursuant to rule 60(b)(1) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. See Utah R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1). We affirm.
Utah appellate courts review a trial court's denial of a motion for relief from judgment under…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yapp v. Excel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Ben Sager Chemicals International, Inc. v. E. Targosz & Co., and Thorson Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Morton v. Continental Baking Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Posner v. Equity Title Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- Stevens v. LaVerkin CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- Brussow v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- In the Matter of the Estate of Joseph R. Wilcock (Wilcock v. Wilcock)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Johnson v. GOLD'S GYMCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.