Legal Opinion
Office of Consumer Counsel v. Department of Public Utility Control
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 4, 1998No. SC 15823PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
The sole issue raised in this administrative appeal is the proper interpretation of Public Acts 1995, No. 95-43, § 1 (c), now codified as General Statutes § 16-19b (c),1 which authorizes the department *20of public utility control to approve an energy adjustment clause for an electric company to be superimposed on the company’s base rate schedule. The named defendant, the department of public utility control (department), approved an energy adjustment clause for the defendant Connecticut Light and Power Company (power company), in accordance with the provisions of § 16-19b…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Truelove & MacLean, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. SpearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. DecaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- MacDermid, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Kelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- In re Jonathan M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- New England Cable Television Ass'n v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.