Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Kongsli

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1952No. 31844PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants in an action for damages occasioned by defendants’ automobile striking a building owned by plaintiffs.

The action was tried to the court, sitting without a jury. At the close of all the evidence presented by both parties, the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ action.

Appellants’ only assignment of error is that the trial court erred in dismissing the action and entering judgment for respondents. No error is assigned upon any of the trial court’s findings of fact. Therefore, we are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. La Lone v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Stoddard v. SmathersWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Barnett v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Schmidt v. Pioneer United DairiesWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Clevenger v. FonsecaWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hill v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Lopeman v. GeeWashington Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API