Legal Opinion
State v. Fairbanks
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 8, 2003No. 22,996PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Defendant appeals from an Order of Conditional Discharge, which required him to pay a $75 crime lab fee. NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-28 (1972) (governing conditional' discharges). The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court properly assessed the crime lab fee pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 31-12-8 (1988) (crime lab fee statute). We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
{2} In July 2000 Defendant was indicted for distribution of an imitation controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance. Defendant entered into a Plea and Disposition Agreement…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MondragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. FranksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Kirkpatrick v. Introspect Healthcare Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HandaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. HarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. SimmonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Vives v. VERZINONew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. MontanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.