Legal Opinion

Olden v. LaFarge Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 24, 2001No. 99-10176-BCPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS ACTION

LAWSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs motion to certify a class action and the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The named plaintiffs are property owners in the City of Alpena, Michigan who claim that their real and personal property have been damaged by toxic pollutants and air contaminants emitted by the defendant during the course of its cement manufacturing operation. Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that particulate…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Julie Olden, Richard Hunter, Wilbur Bleau, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lafarge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Bentley v. Honeywell International Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
  5. Davis v. DCB Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API