Legal Opinion
Mauro v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 28, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Determination of respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), dated May 21, 2002, which denied petitioner landlords’ application to terminate a finding of harassment dated September 14, 1995, found that petitioners committed additional acts of harassment, and assessed civil penalties totaling $9,200, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Rosalyn Richter, J.], entered April 10, 2003) dismissed, without costs.
Respondent’s determination was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Meko Holding, Inc. v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gray v. Oxford Worldwide Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006