Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Hemphill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 25, 1968No. 4738PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

This is a slip-and-fall case. Mrs. Hemphill recovered judgment against The Kroger Company and the manager of its Morrilton store, C. E. Jackson. Defendants appeal from the refusal of the trial court to grant motions for a directed verdict which were made at the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony and again at the close of all the testimony.

On the question of liability Mr. and Mrs. Hemphill were claimant’s only witnesses and their testimony can be summarized in a few sentences. Around its modern store in Morrilton, Kroger maintains an asphalt parking area of considerable…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anjou v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. PopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Kroger Grocery Baking Company v. DempseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Owen v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Skaggs Companies, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Lemay v. W & R Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Dennis v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Harry Roland Harvey, Sr. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Harry Roland Harvey, Sr. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API