Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Popkins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1953No. 6 Div. 317, 318PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review two appeals by the defendant in two cases tried jointly after they were consolidated. They are for personal injuries received by appellee Mrs. Popkins in one- case, and for the loss of her companionship in the. other case by. her husband, appellee in it.

Mrs. Popkins is shown to have slipped and fallen as she was leaving a self-service grocery store of appellant’s in Birmingham. She did not make a purchase and had no groceries to check,' apparently because the meat counter was'closed.

The customers on leaving passed through an aisle, by which on the left was located a stall…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Farmers' & Merchants' Warehouse Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Ten Ball Novelty & Manufacturing Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Britling Cafeteria Co. v. NaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Kittrell v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Foodtown Stores, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. SH Kress & Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. DELCHAMPS, INCORPORATED v. StewartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  4. May-Bilt, Inc. v. DeeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API