Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harry Roland Harvey, Sr. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1994No. 94-1119Published

1DissentFloyd R. Gibson, Senior Circuit Judge

Because I believe there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict, I dissent. Harvey testified that the substance was yellow, dirty, and wet in the middle with dried and crusted edges. His companion described it as soapy-looking, foamy, and containing trash and debris. In slip and fall cases, the Arkansas Supreme Court has acknowledged the importance of a foreign object’s condition in determining the length of time it has remained in a particular place where it is likely to cause injury. Jackson v. Hemphill, 245 Ark. 699, 434 S.W.2d 818, 819-20 (1968) (describing cases where banana…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loyd S. DACE, Appellant, v. ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Sanders v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Jackson v. HemphillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API