State Ex Rel. Duganitz v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Duganitz claims that the court of appeals erred in granting the APA’s motion for summary judgment and denying the writ. Civ.R. 56(C) provides that before summary judgment may be granted, it must be determined that (1) no genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated, (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and (3) it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, and viewing the evidence most strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, that conclusion is adverse to the nonmoving party. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Stahl v. ShoemakerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Hattie v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Flenoy v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Zanders v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by52 opinions
- State ex rel. Larkins v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Havel v. Villa St. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Dussell v. Lakewood Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. Duganitz v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Courie v. AlcoaOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.