Legal Opinion
Franco v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 22, 2006No. Civil Action 05-1058PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint. The plaintiffs, Samuel Franco, Nathan Franco, Allen Franco, and D Mart (collectively, “the plaintiffs”) filed suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking declaratory judgment, an injunction and damages. The plaintiffs allege that the District of Columbia, National Capital Revitalization Corporation (“NCRC”), and RLA Revitalization Corporation (collectively, “the defendants”) through use of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Franco v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- DeSilva v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011