Legal Opinion
DeSilva v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 2011No. 10-CV-1069PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
Appellants Peter DeSilva, Joseph Rum-ber, and Rose Rumber (collectively “appellants”) appeal the trial court’s final judgment in this case in favor of appellee, the District of Columbia. This is yet another case presented to this court involving the redevelopment of the Skyland Shopping Center (“Skyland”) and the condemnation of private property for that purpose by the National Capital Revitalization Corporation (“NCRC”) under the doctrine of eminent domain. 1 The federal courts in this jurisdiction also have heard cases pertaining to NCRC and Skyland. 2 In addition, we…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Desilva v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Desilva v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Greene v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012