People v. Drake
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J.,
The defendant was convicted of the felony defined in section 266d of the Penal Code. The section is as follows:—
“Every person who receives any money or other valuable thing for or on account of his placing in custody any female for the purpose of causing her to cohabit with any male to whom she is not married, is guilty of a felony.”
By this definition, in order to constitute the offense, it is made imperative that the female in question shall have been “placed in custody” by the person charged. The use of the words “in custody” necessarily implies that she must be placed where she is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lewis v. DunneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Spring v. DahlmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Wilkes v. Slaughter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1824
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Hisel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Kos v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Missoula County Free High School v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.