Legal Opinion

Hisel v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1987No. B024069PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J. *

This appeal raises a single issue, one of first impression: whether the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), as amended in 1982, continues to bar civil actions by nondependent heirs against the employer of a decedent who was killed in the course and scope of employment. We conclude that it does, and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

The decedent, Jerald Hisel, was employed as a firefighter specialist by respondent, County of Los Angeles. He suffered a fatal accident on December 14, 1983, while assisting a crew of prisoners in placing a culvert…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Greener v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Le Parc Community Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Pickrel v. General Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Sturtevant v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API