Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
Defendants, a commercial copartnership, doing business in the city of New Orleans, ordered from plaintiff, a manufacturer of the city of New York, a certain lot of merchandise, included in which were 50 dozen “Jap” silk shirts at an agreed price t of $57.50 a dozen, f. o. b. New York. The merchandise was duly shipped to, and received by, the defendants. The shirts were not paid for, and plaintiff instituted the present suit to recover $2,875, the agreed price thereof, together with legal interest from March 26, 1920, the date of shipment. The defense, as set up in the answer, was lack, of…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Anderson v. Louisiana Oil Refg. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Corrosion Rectifying Co. v. Freeport Sulphur Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
- Nolen v. Davidson's SuccessionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Levingston Supply Co. v. BassoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Tulane Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Singer Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.