Legal Opinion
Nolen v. Davidson's Succession
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1939No. 5933PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Judge.
Suspensive appeals from orders of execu-tory process were perfected by the Succession of L. M. Davidson, represented by C. O. Davidson, in three suits instituted against it by J. S. Nolen. In view of the similarity of issues involved, the causes have been consolidated by agreement of counsel for the purpose of consideration here. A discussion of all of them will be attempted in this opinion; however, separate decrees will be entered. ,
In the proceedings plaintiff seeks the foreclosure of a crop lien, a mortgage and a chattel mortgage allegedly granted by L. M. Davidson to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. CappelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Franek v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Bank of Leesville v. WingateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Silberberg v. Kalil & MickalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Mathe v. McCrystalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Contract Purchase Corp. v. DoyleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Louisiana National Bank of Baton Rouge v. HeromanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Catalanotto v. Associates DiscountLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Li Rocchi v. KeenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. SpringLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.