Legal Opinion
Venturi v. Taylor
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 1995No. B084425PublishedCited by 6 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (S. J.), P. J.
We hold, in the published portion of this opinion, that a potential creditor with actual notice of the pendency of estate proceedings cannot excuse the untimely filing of a creditor’s claim on the ground that the administrator failed to send a formal notice of administration of the estate, as required by Probate Code section 9050. 1
Daniel S. Venturi (hereinafter appellant) appeals from a judgment entered following grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Jerrie L. Taylor and Joan McGarry, co-administrators of the estate of Gordon Mueller, deceased,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Clark v. KerbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Burgos v. TamulonisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Gertner v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilkison v. WiederkehrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Estate of StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Petrulis v. WilksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Ferrer v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Martinez v. University of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.