Legal Opinion

Alto Township v. Mendenhall

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2011No. 25933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] On August 20, 2010, the trial court issued an order requiring Keith and Lisa Mendenhall (the Mendenhalls) to comply with the provisions of a county resolution before erecting and maintaining a fence or gate across a section-line highway stretching between two sections of the Mendenhalls’ property. After the Men-denhalls installed a fence and gate across the section-line highway, Alto Township brought a motion for contempt citation, alleging that the Mendenhalls failed to comply with the trial court’s order. The trial court found the Mendenhalls in contempt of court.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. K & E Land and Cattle, Inc. v. MayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. LyonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Shedd v. LambSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Keller v. KellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Detmers v. CostnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API