Legal Opinion
Bazinet v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 26, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff had a verdict of $2200 for personal injuries sustained by her as a result of a fall on an icy sidewalk. The defendant appealed from the denial of its motion to set aside the verdict and from the judgment.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts: Buckingham Street intersects but does not cross Main Street in Hartford. This intersection is near the center of the city and is much used by vehicles and pedestrians. At its northwest corner there is a small park surrounded by an iron fence and bounded on the south and east by public sidewalks. The park is owned by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carl v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Ritter v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Scoville v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Frohlich v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Jennes v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Prato v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Wadlund v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- New Britain Trust Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.