Legal Opinion

Hand v. Osgood

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Lenawee; Lane, J. Assumpsit by Hernán Hand against Bdmuind Osgood for the breach of a parol contract for a le'ase. From a .judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

(Grant, J.

Plaintiff instituted this suit to recover damages for the violation of an executory paxml agreement that defendant would execute a lease to him of certain laxxds for one year, with the privilege of thx’ee, at the ■annual rental of flOO per year. The court instructed the jury that, if they found such to be the contract, the plaintiff was entitled to recover as damages the difference between the market value of the lease and What he •agreed to pay for it.

It is conceded that, if this was a contract for a lease for •a longer period than a year, it is void under the statute of frauds. 2…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blake v. . VoigtNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hall v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Grimes v. Van VechtenMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Whiting v. OhlertMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hill v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Marble v. Town of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Caplis v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Falk v. DevendorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Robinson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API