Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1986No. 50760PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, Samuel Howard, appeals from his convictions, after a jury trial of two counts of sale of heroin. He was sentenced to concurrent fifteen year terms of imprisonment. We affirm.

The evidence supports defendant’s convictions. It established that defendant sold heroin to an undercover narcotics officer, Junius Ranciville on April 24, 1984 and April 30, 1984 at the corner of Spring and St. Louis in the City of St. Louis.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to testimony concerning a photograph of defendant and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Asam v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Horton v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. State v. CannadyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HornbuckleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. CarrMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. MuthoferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API