Sweet v. Markwart
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVandyke, P. J.
Three matters having to do with the appeals herein have been presented to this court for decision. Appellant has petitioned this court that it issue its writ of mandate directed to the trial court ordering it to settle appellant’s proposed statement on appeal under rule 7 of the Rules on Appeal in order that he may engross the same and file it with this court. Concurrently, respondents have moved to dismiss the appeals on various grounds. Appellant has petitioned this court for relief from default in that he has not as yet filed his record. All three matters were heard together and we shall…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Averill v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Costa v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Walkerley v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Flint v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. HuldermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Estate of FossaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Sweet v. MarkwartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.