Legal Opinion

Packard v. Foster

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 3, 1948No. 3700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

In our opinion the recommendation of the master must be followed and title to the two deposits decreed to be in the administrator of the estate of John 0. Howell. The findings of the master that the decedent never surrendered control over the deposits to the plaintiff are amply sustained by the evidence. The plaintiff herself admitted that she never had the books, nor access to the deposit box in Howell’s name where they were kept, nor drew money from either account. It is plain that the decedent retained full control over the deposits until his death and hence there was no gift inter vivos…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burns v. NoletteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  2. Ibey v. IbeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  3. Dover Coöperative Bank v. Estate of TobinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  4. New Hampshire Savings Bank v. McMullenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  5. Bartlett v. RemingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In the Matter of JacksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Espinosa v. PetritisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API