Legal Opinion

New Hampshire Savings Bank v. McMullen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 5, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The claimant Alexander’s contention that upon the uncontroverted facts he is entitled to a decree awarding the deposit to him is based on the premise that when a deposit stands in the name of two or more persons, there is a presumption of equal ownership which cannot be overcome without affirmative proof. His counsel suggest that the trial court by refusing to adopt this rule (the substance of which is embodied in one of their written requests) gave no weight “to Nancy’s record title,” that “Alexander, who claimed under Nancy, was required to show that Nancy acquired title .under such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott v. Berkshire County Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Sinift v. SiniftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Idaho First Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re Wladyslaw Wszolek EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. DeLong v. Farmers Building and Loan AssociationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API