Legal Opinion

Ibey v. Ibey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 28, 1945No. 3543PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

The ruling that the gifts were not perfected and therefore ineffective was erroneous. The three bonds purchased and made payable on death to certain individuals were contracts with the United States for the benefit of third parties and as such entirely valid. Harvey v. Rackliffe, 141 Me. 169; Reynolds v. Chase, 87 N. H. 227, 230. The gifts were made through contracts duly executed, and there was no requirement that delivery be made to the donees personally in order to complete their rights in accordance with the terms of the contracts. Whether these bonds were acquired with funds used…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harvey v. RackliffeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  2. Anderson v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1953
  3. Simpkins v. SnowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Land v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Union National Bank v. JessellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API