Legal Opinion

Van Kirk v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1956No. Civ. 21858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *

Petitioner here is the plaintiff in an action for personal injuries brought by him in the respondent court against American Bus Lines, Inc. The trial court has stayed all proceedings in said action, either to dispose thereof on its merits, or to permit plaintiff to take the deposition of the driver of defendant’s bus. Petitioner here seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent court to vacate its order staying all proceedings and to compel the respondent court to permit plaintiff to prosecute discovery proceedings in the action.

Defendant in the subject action, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diners Club, Inc. v. A. J. Bumb, Trustee of Dashew Business MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Kapczynski v. T.M.T. Trailer Ferry, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Bartlett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Mihojevich v. HarrodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API