Bartlett v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem.*
Petitioner is coexecutor under the will of George Maurice Bartlett, hereinafter called Bartlett. Upon the appointment of petitioner and her coexecutor they came into possession of and still have possession of a business conducted by Bartlett during his lifetime and since coming into possession have continued to operate that business. The business was inventoried by them as one of the assets of the estate.
After taking possession of the business and while operating it petitioner and her coexecutor petitioned the respondent court pursuant to section 572 of the Probate Code…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Guardianship of VucinichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Pritchard v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Gering v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.