Circle Dot Ranch, Inc. v. Sidwell Oil & Gas, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.
Circle Dot Ranch, Inc. and Euline Walser perfected this appeal to contend the trial court improperly directed a verdict against them in their action to cancel a voluntarily pooled gas unit and to recover royalties under their lease based upon the alleged bad faith of lessees Sidwell Oil and Gas, Inc., et al. (Sidwell).1 By a cross-point, Sidwell asserts error in the trial court’s overruling of its motion for partial new trial on the issue of attorney’s fees. For the reasons to be expressed, we will reverse and remand.
Circle Dot Ranch, Inc. and Euline Walser…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- Amoco Production Co. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
- Jones v. KillingsworthTexas Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southeastern Pipe Line Co., Inc. v. TichacekTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Sun Operating Ltd. Partnership v. Holt, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
- Mission Resources, Inc. v. Garza Energy Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Union Gas Corp. v. Gisler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.