Legal Opinion

Guy KINOSHITA and Ronald Nakashima, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CANADIAN PACIFIC AIRLINES, LIMITED, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 24, 1986No. 84-2785PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Guy Kinoshita and Ronald K. Nakashima appeal the judgment, entered after trial to the court, in favor of defendant Canadian Pacific Airlines (CP Air). Plaintiffs contend the district court erroneously held that CP Air’s Employee Rules did not constitute a binding contract and erroneously held that CP Air’s discharge of the plaintiffs did not violate public policy. Having certified the first issue to the Hawaii Supreme Court, we now affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Kinoshita and Nakashima worked as part-time passenger agents…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kinoshita v. Canadian Pacific Airlines, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Moore v. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re: Genesys Data Technologies, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  2. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1992
  3. Meindl v. Genesys Pacific Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. Boscarino v. The Auto Club GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  5. Sidney Diggs, IV v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API