Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sidney Diggs, IV v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1989No. 86-1480Published

1DissentKrupansky, Circuit Judge

Because the majority’s disposition of the diversity case at bar extends the wrongful discharge doctrine of Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, 408 Mich. 579, 292 N.W.2d 880 (1980) in a manner inconsistent with Michigan court precedent, I am constrained to respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion.

This appellate review must determine if the defendant, in terminating its employee *930plaintiff Sydney Diggs (Diggs), breached a contract with the plaintiff to discharge him only for “just causes.” Diggs anchored his complaint solely upon a statement of Keith Haslam (Haslam),…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. William Blackburn v. Dale FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Lynas v. Maxwell FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Valentine v. General American Credit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API