Sidney Diggs, IV v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentKrupansky, Circuit Judge
Because the majority’s disposition of the diversity case at bar extends the wrongful discharge doctrine of Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, 408 Mich. 579, 292 N.W.2d 880 (1980) in a manner inconsistent with Michigan court precedent, I am constrained to respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion.
This appellate review must determine if the defendant, in terminating its employee *930plaintiff Sydney Diggs (Diggs), breached a contract with the plaintiff to discharge him only for “just causes.” Diggs anchored his complaint solely upon a statement of Keith Haslam (Haslam),…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- William Blackburn v. Dale FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Lynas v. Maxwell FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Valentine v. General American Credit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.