Legal Opinion

Kinoshita v. Canadian Pacific Airlines, Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1986No. CIVIL NO. 83-0011; CIVIL NO. 83-0012; NO. 11148; 9TH CIR. NO. 83-0011PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has certified to this court that there is a question concerning the law of Hawaii which is determinative of a pending appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii and there is no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the appellate courts of the State. 1 The question is whether the Employee Rules of Canadian Pacific Airlines Limited (CP Air) constitute a contract enforceable by employees. Reviewing the facts outlined in the certification, we answer affirmatively.

I

A

CP…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Leong v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1988
  2. In Re: Genesys Data Technologies, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Shoppe v. Gucci America, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API