Legal Opinion
Argonaut Consolidated Mining Co. v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 14, 1931No. 397PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff is a Maine corporation, whose primary purpose is to hold the shares of .the Argonaut Mining Company, which as its name implies, is engaged in the mining of gold, and whose properties are in California. The plaintiff in 1909 purchased fifty-one per cent, of the shares of this company and has held them ever since; upon them it has received dividends, somewhat irregularly, from time to time, which it has used both in-the declaration of dividends and for purposes to be mentioned later. A majority of the plaintiff’s shares are in turn held by a third…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- McCoach v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Zonne v. Minneapolis SyndicateSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Magruder v. Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Realty Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Southern Pacific Co. v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- New Haven Securities Co. v. BitgoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- United States v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- American Investment Securities Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.