American Investment Securities Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.
This is another of those unsatisfactory cases calling for a determination whether, on particular facts, a corporation is “carrying on or doing business” within the meaning of the Revenue Acts.1 No decided case is squarely in point; the criterion is none too sharply defined. The court below, in a suit by the taxpayer corporation to recover back capital stock excise taxes collected for the fiscal years ending June 30, 1933, 1934, 1935, and 1936, held that the corporation had been doing business during those years, and gave judgment for the defendant.
American Investment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- McCoach v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Edwards v. Chile Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Argonaut Consolidated Mining Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Eaton v. Phoenix Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Magruder v. Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Realty Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Radol v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Hercules Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Harrisburg Hotel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Section Seven Corp. v. AnglimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.