Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. McColgan

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1945No. Civ. 12631PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff, Southern Pacific Company, appeals from a judgment denying it a refund of taxes assessed against it for the taxable year 1935 under the Bank and Corporation Franchise Tax Act. (Stats. 1929, p. 19, as amended; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1931, Act 8488, p. 4763; 1933 Supp., p. 2329; 1935 Supp., p. 1929.)

Under the act, taxes for the year 1935 are computed on 1934 income. (§ 4.) In making its tax return plaintiff showed no net income for the year 1934, but a net loss of $7,359,133.03. Accordingly, plaintiff paid the minimum flat tax of $25. Thereafter, the defendant Franchise Tax Commissioner…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. El Dorado Oil Works v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API