Legal Opinion
Birkland v. Rotary Plaza, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 7, 1986No. C-84-2026 SWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case, which involves mandatory meal programs for elderly residents of federally subsidized housing projects. On August 23, 1985, this court found that the mandatory meal policy of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), found in HUD Handbook 4350.3 §§ 3-14 and 4-13 (1981), was adopted in violation of the publication requirement of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and in violation of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Charles Laduke v. Alan C. Nelson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Gilbert A. Cuneo v. Donald H. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gonzalez v. St. Margaret's House Housing Development Fund Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987