Krummen v. Still
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Chief Justice.
In 1931 appellant, Ed Krummen, sold to appellees, C. L. Still and wife, a tract of 271 acres of land near Stuttgart, Arkansas, for a consideration of $4,000 cash and $11,-000 in notes.. •
Appellees’ theory is that they were induced to buy the land by fraudulent representations made to them by appellant; that after they had charged appellant with the fraud, he and they agreed to cancel the sale, on condition that they convey the land back to him, and he cancel their notes; that they performed their part of the agreement by conveying the land back to him, hut that he…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Babcock v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Hare v. ReilyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Dyer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cash Register Sales & Services of Houston, Inc. v. Copelco Capital, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- Zapata County v. LlanosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Stephens v. ThomassonArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Bondeson v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Fender v. Delta Mud & Drilling Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.